專業資格人員的japan property agency
Singapore’s fertility rate in the 1960s was as high as 5.4. Under the influence of the international overpopulation trend, the government began to introduce birth control measures in the 1970s. It mainly combines economic and administrative means, including legalizing abortion and ligation, and cancels maternity leave, childcare allowance and other benefits for families with three or more children, increases hospitalization expenses, and extends the application period of HDB. japan property agency The policy tone is “allowing to have two children, and having more children becomes more expensive. Historically, there have been family planning policies in Korea, Singapore, and Japan, but these policies have also turned to people due to demographic problems and aging. We have discussed the changes in the population structure for the real estate market in the 2016 Population Data Report “Population Quality vs. the Future”. japan property agency Therefore, we select these neighboring countries to sort out their fertility policies and help us understand the possible future fertility in China. Policy changes, as well as potential real estate market impacts. Third, the discount rate and premium rate. If the book value is 100, how much price do we use to buy assets? Hong Kong has a 35% discount and can buy 100 yuan of assets with 65 yuan. Last year, Singapore was still a small discount, and this year has already had a premium. japan property agency Currently, the products of REITs are basically purchased at the book value in the Singapore and Japan markets. Basically, the leverage ratio of the entire REITs is relatively low compared to real estate companies, especially Hong Kong and Singapore. Their leverage ratio is 45%, which is relatively low, and Japan is relatively high, 50%. Low fertility is also a challenge for the world, and the decline in birth rates is a long-term trend in both developed and developing countries. In the developed countries of Europe and the United States, the fertility rate has declined sharply since the early 19th century. The birth rate has been steadily decreasing since 1964 in middle-income countries. Although the birth rate is low in low-income and low-income countries, it still maintains a steady decline. japan property agency Throughout the country, countries with family planning will gradually phase out without exception after the policy has been in operation for a period of time, and even begin to gradually subsidize to encourage childbearing. After the birth peak of the echoes of the 1980s, South Korea’s fertility rate fell by a cliff, and the total fertility rate fell from 2.5 to 1.5. In 1996, the South Korean government gave up the policy of controlling population growth and switched to the “new population policy”, but the total fertility rate continued to drop to 1.47 in 2000 and 1.17 in 2002, even lower than Japan, which was plagued by aging. japan property agency According to South Korean media reports, the South Korean government has invested at least 3.7 trillion won in the policy of unpaid care in recent years to encourage Koreans to give birth. In addition, the South Korean government has implemented a half-century “advised abortion” policy to “eliminate abortion.” However, the encouraging effect is not optimistic. The natural population growth rate and total fertility rate of the Korean population have only increased in 2006 and 2007 after the policy was promulgated. japan property agency There is no transitional policy like South Korea. In order to ensure the sustainable development of the population, in 2001, the Singapore government issued a package of plans to encourage marriage and childbirth, and continue to increase policy. Although Singapore’s family planning time is shorter and the population policy is more positive and rapid than that of South Korea’s transformation, Singapore’s natural population growth rate and total fertility rate have only grown in 1987 and 1988 after the policy was enacted, and natural growth. The rate rose from 10.2% in 1986 to 14.9% in 1988. The total fertility rate rose from 1.43 to 1.96, and then began to fall. It only increased slightly before and after the 2001 new birth policy was promulgated.